Overview:
An overview of the 1953 Iran coup, known as Operation Ajax, and how the Cold War intervention continues to influence relations between Iran and the United States.
The crisis, known as the 1953 Iran Coup, centered on Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. Mohammad Mossadegh was a prominent Iranian politician who became prime minister in 1951 and later nationalized Iran’s oil industry.
This triggered an international crisis that drew the attention of Western powers early in the Cold War.
The events that followed led to the coup d’état in Iran in 1953, also referred to as Operation Ajax. This removed Mossadegh from office and restored Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as Iran’s monarch.

Photo: William Arthur Cram / Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain)
Oil, Nationalism, and a Global Power Struggle
Operation Ajax and Covert Intervention
The Long Shadow of 1953

Photo: Unknown author / Sajed.ir archive / Wikimedia Commons (GFDL)
A Lasting Source of Mistrust
The legacy of the coup continues to hang over the relations between Tehran and Washington, analysts say. Although the US has since confessed to its role in the coup, the events have been an important symbol in Iranian domestic politics.
Some analysts of the coup have sought to focus on the impact it has had on Iranian perceptions of foreign intervention. A study of Operation Ajax, for example, argues that the coup has had political fallout that extends far beyond its initial outcome. In the open-access journal article The Domino Effect of Operation Ajax, researchers write that “nothing turned out the way anyone had hoped and Tehran to this day continues to use the 1953 coup d’état as justification for its fraught relationship with the West.”
The episode is also frequently cited in broader analyses of Western involvement in the Middle East. A review of Fawaz A. Gerges’s book What Really Went Wrong by the Review of Books, published by the London School of Economics, stated that Western foreign policy during the Cold War often undermined democracy in the region.
According to the review, foreign intervention was one factor contributing to instability in the region. As the article notes, Western interventions “have systematically hindered democratic movements, instead establishing authoritarian regimes that serve strategic interests,” a dynamic that critics say played out in Iran after the 1953 coup.
Understanding the Past
This coup is still a major reference point today in the discourse of the relations between the US and Iran. Some theories suggest the coup was motivated by Cold War fears of communism. Others have theorized that the economic interests, such as the management of oil, were equally important.
Regardless, the coup is recognized as one of the most important events in the history of Iran. It has had an impact on the country’s political course, the formation of the Shah’s regime, and the events that led to the revolution of 1979.
Moreover, the case demonstrates the long-lasting impact of foreign intervention on the country’s politics. The events of 1953 changed both Iran’s leadership and U.S.-Iran relations for decades.
A History Still Felt Today
More than seventy years later, the coup’s legacy still shapes relations between the two nations. Many scholars say the legacy of the 1953 coup shows history’s lasting influence on international relations.
Though Mossadegh’s overthrow occurred in August 1953, it has had a lasting influence on decades of political change. As debates over diplomacy, sanctions, and regional security continue, the legacy of the 1953 coup remains powerful.
Sources:
Reuters — “U.S.-Iran relations from 1953 coup to 2023 detainee swap deal”
The Washington Post — “The U.S. Helped oust Iran’s government in 1953. Here’s what happened”
Prime Scholars — American Journal of Computer Science and Engineering Survey — “The Domino Effect of Operation Ajax”
Stanford University Department of History — “Aug. 19, 1953: Operation Ajax-Priya Satia”
Editor’s Disclaimer: This article provides historical context about the 1953 Iranian coup d’état and its role in shaping modern U.S.–Iran relations. It draws on reporting from Reuters and The Washington Post, scholarly research, and declassified archival documents to explain the historical events discussed. The article is intended for informational and educational purposes and does not represent an endorsement of any political position or interpretation beyond the cited sources.

